Intake
A closed room. We name the question, the people, the exports that can be prepared without private threads, and the days a practitioner will be visible on the floor.
Method
App analytics of collaboration behaviour, as we practise it, is not a feed of charts. It is a sequence a team can explain to itself: what we were allowed to see, who sat with us, and which sentences in the briefing came from the carpet rather than the export.
A closed room. We name the question, the people, the exports that can be prepared without private threads, and the days a practitioner will be visible on the floor.
Full days, not walk-throughs. Hour, seats, standing talk, rooms lit versus rooms booked. No cameras. Notebooks that a curious colleague may ask about.
Calendars, room logs, channel names, timestamps. Titles and clocks. Not message bodies, not direct chats, not personal devices.
Scenes plus tables. A sponsor walkthrough. Then, if booked, a half-day sitting that produces a short agreement rather than a slide stack.
Workplace apps are good at claims: this room is booked, this person is in a meeting, this channel is “project-critical”. They are poor at the pantry table after 5:15, the ghost desk reservation, the hybrid morning when the only estimator came in and waited. Collaboration behaviour lives in that gap. A review that used only exports would flatter the software. A visit that used only vibes would flatter the visitor. We hold both.
If an administrator offers a full archive because it is easier, we refuse. If a brief wants a league table of evening senders for a performance file, we refuse. If the team cannot be told we are coming, we refuse. Johor Bahru floors are small enough that rumours travel faster than a kick-off note; we still send the note.
Intake can be in English or Bahasa Malaysia. Briefings are usually English for the sponsor file, with a sitting run in the language the team actually argues in. A second written language is a quoted extra, not a default.
Headcount, district, the question in one paragraph, and whether calendar or timestamp exports already exist. That is enough for us to say Collaboration Behaviour Review, a narrower study, or not our work. Method does not replace a study page; it is how every study on this site is supposed to feel when you are in it.